I want to skip a long section later.
About that book, I started to think she deleted it herself. I also thought that as long as she apologized, I would delete the hanging ones too.
You don't have to search now, it's gone.
However, her attitude is - repeated quibbling.
She said that she collected my essays because she was afraid of copying them from me... I have nothing to say.
The connotation here is that I am famous and bully her.
I'll just say one point, will I hang up directly without evidence? The evidence is conclusive, and I have the confidence to go to you.
Readers are not fools, they can tell if they are plagiarizing. If I have no proof, I will slander you and make my reputation stink?! What's in it for me?
She said she wanted to return the book, and then sent me such a paragraph.
Are you still threatening people?
She said there was a similarity, so I copied her. Note that there is only one.
You plagiarized me in nearly ten places, so I couldn't bear it, okay? And didn't you say to quit the speech book? Saying that this place makes you sick, you come to see me again?
After stalking for an hour or two, to be honest, I'm a little scared of this kind of person. She can hold on to it even if she doesn't care.
I am really afraid now that she will not give up, after all, what she said can be swallowed by herself. I am afraid that she will later point to one or two words that may be similar to make things happen.
I am not afraid of shadow slant, but I don't want to make it smoky here. I am afraid of you, the plagiarist is more justifiable than the plagiarist, you are the boss.
So based on that -- what do I want now, is to skip a big paragraph, just write the rest of the story, and end it early?
Of course, I still want to ask your opinion, and I want to be responsible to you.
Here, I don't know if you really don't understand the situation, or if you wash it with a trumpet. After all, you haven't collected and followed my book, and you haven't commented on it before.
What I'm trying to say is, needless to say, the evidence is solid, take a good look before speaking, and she admits it herself.
I'll show you a screenshot of what she said directly.
She didn't admit it the first time before, and now she finally let it slip.
Note here that when she copied it for the first time, she said she wrote it herself, because she read too many books and confused them.
And then I pointed out that she had copied not only mine, but other plots of the wife under the brocade, and she said this.
She quipped again that she hadn't seen it.
Inconsistencies, inconsistencies in speech, were pointed out by me.
She finally had nothing to say, no way to defend herself, so she had to admit to plagiarism -
She said this, as if I forced her to admit it, obviously she missed the flaw.
The point is -- after she admits to plagiarizing, her interface looks like this.
I Buddha, your operation is to pretend to be pitiful and apologize, and then let others think that you are forced to admit that you did not plagiarize, and you are a victim.
What a big white lotus.
I have made it clear here, the evidence has also been sent, and there are people who doubt and tamper with my meaning. I don't care if you really don't understand it, or if you wash it with a trumpet, all go back.
From beginning to end, I have never said that you scolded us. I really don't understand what you mean by this sentence?
To sum up, the whole explanation is clear.
Back to the topic, this thing is giving me a headache, I just want to code well.
What do you think? That is, whether to write the back directly and not the middle. In fact, I am quite hesitant, will this be out of context? But I am really afraid that she will come again.
Please give your opinion below.
I still have to thank everyone. She said that her article was reported, but there was still a draft. This should not be deleted by herself, but the report was successful.
Thank you for supporting ❤
